Database
 

Thresholds Database > Vegetation shift; Florida Everglades, USA

Certainty of shift: Demonstrated
Location: North America, USA, Florida, The Everglades
System Type: Social-Ecological
Regime Shift Category: 3a
Ecosystem Type
Wetland
Spatial Scale
Landscape/Local
Type of Resource Use
Conservation
Number of Possible Regimes
2
Ecosystem Service
Recreation, Ecotourism, agriculture, urban
Time Scale of Change
Years
Resource Users
 
Reversibility of Shift
Reversible

Background

The 5000 year old Everglade wetland is primarily limited by phosphorus. In the late 1940's, the Everglades were divided into three designated land uses; agriculture, urban and conservation. Water levels in the channels changed and there was a large-scale shift in the vegetation in the 1970's and 1980's, from sawgrass to cattail-dominated marshes immediately adjacent to the agricultural land. A slow increase in soil phosphorus, has meant that disturbances such as fire, drought or frosts can no longer be absorbed and instead result in a shift in vegetation type.

Alternate Regimes

1. Sawgrass marshes (occur at <300ppm phosphorus)

2. Cattail, blue-green algae (occur at >300ppm phosphorus)

Fast or Dependent Variable(s)
Vegetation species composition
Slow or Independent Variable(s)
Soil phosphorus concentration
Disturbance or Threshold Trigger(s)
Nutrient input, water level, fires, frosts, droughts
External / Internal Trigger
External

Mechanism

Soil phosphorus entered the marshes from the agricultural land. Above 300ppm phosphorus, disturbances such as fire, frost and drought allow cattails and blue-green algae to dominate. In addition, deeper water, as experienced in many channels, favours cattails over sawgrass.

Management Decisions in Each Regime

State 1: The designation of the northern third of The Everglades for agricultural land in the 1940's has been directly responsible for the addition of phosphorus into the water. In addition, in the early 1900's, the hydrology of The Everglades was altered with the construction of an extensive network of canals and levees. Some areas have been drained, whilst others experience increased water depths.



State 2: Efforts are being made to restore the hydroperiod of the managed Everglades.

Contact
Jacqui Meyers

Email
jacqui.meyers@csiro.au

CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,
PO Box 284,
Canberra ACT 2601

Keywords
Pollution, empirical data

References

Gunderson, L. H. 2001. Managing Surprising Ecosystems in Southern Florida. Ecological Economics 37, no. 3: 371-78. (D)

Newman, S., J. Schuette, J. B. Grace, K. Rutchey, T. Fontaine, K. R. Reddy, and M. Pietrucha. 1998. Factors Influencing Cattail Abundance in the Northern Everglades. Aquatic Botany 60, no. 3: 265-80. (E)

Newman, S., J. B. Grace, and J. W. Koebel. Effects on Nutrients and Hydroperiod on Typha, Cladium, and Eleocharis: Implications for Everglades Restoration. Ecological Applications 6, no. 3: 774-83. (E)

Further Reading:
Davis, S. M., and J. C. Ogden. 1994. Everglades, The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. 357-78. Florida: St. Lucie Press.

Gunderson, L. H. 1992. Spatial and Temporal Hierarchies in the Everglades Ecosystem. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.